![]() They then did some work to "normalise" these figures. damage, kills, spots, base defence points, etc). The PC version appears to be based on a player folio universe for per tank stats, in order to compute the "expected" performance per tank (e.g. Because of this, the score fluctuates a little as medians shift or as you improve/deteriorate.Įdited by leongkitmeng, 17 September 2015 - 12:42 PM. It uses the medians of players for tanks to eliminate inherent tank capabilities from measurements of player capabilities. Wotbstar and cellbrock now use it but with a discrepancy. WN8 is very new on blitz and still in beta stage. It's supposed to eventually obsoleted by WN8.Ĩ. It applies a tier penalty for average tier below 5. WN7 is based on dmg/tier and is the current system of choice for most people but it also has deficiencies that WN8 is supposed to eliminate. WN6 is based on dmg/tier and was a first good attempt to find a decent rating system but had deficiencies. It also has a 5% penalty or bonus per tier deviation from tier 7.ĥ. Main complaint against it is the platoon penalty applied across the board. Star1 uses medians per tank and consolidates for tiers. MGR is only limited to ter 7 and above so it's not useful to the majority of players who play low to mid tiers.Ĥ. It's aim isn't purely to measure a player.ģ. PR is too biased IMO as it's geared towards getting more people to play more often. It's been largely fallen into disuse but wblitz still uses it.Ģ. ER is an old system that hardly anyone uses anymore. They all seem to be quite different with only the WN6 and WN7 close enough to each other to be similar.ġ. There's been a few polls and discussions on rating systems but none that capture all (that I've found so far) so I'm just recreating a fresh poll to include in the new WN8 as well as the Russian one MGR. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |